Talk is NOT cheap, just plentiful
Today's Live Stream is 2pm UK, https://youtu.be/Sd7j7QDqtHU join me via YT Chat, phone, or audiovisual Streamyard. Spread the word. * Guests are requested * Something good to discuss? Call In. 🙂
I watched this video and was so moved by it: I had a tear in my eye by the end. Basically, the thought that there are decent professionals out there, saying it how it really is and I found this so inspiring https://brandnewtube.com/v/T7gYlZ it is a wakeup call for everyone, especially in light of the bullsh*t extension of the CV Act for another 6 months for no reason whatsoever, except if it was repealed, all this would go away - no emergency legislation = no BS laws and restrictions. Life really would go back to normal.
everyone knows you shouldn't respond to the moronic sad trolls, whom it appears have come over (finally) from my travel channel. This comment has got through to appear live despite the security, although to be fair there has been no need to install the same levels of security as AWT because this channel has always been normal and lacking (too many) of those small-minded dickheads. What they want is to elicit a reaction from me, hence reference to UK benefits, the wife being a "cheater", and mentioning Thailand (the connection here, from AWT).
All are borne from jealousy and envy, and to some extent hate. One particular person is now on 2.5 years of hate. I am fully aware writing this is like playing with their small testicles and making them spout off like its a wet dream, because that is what gives them their narcissistic kick of endorphins, however the point of leaving this for you to see, is to ask you to go and report these comments and also click the channel link, then go to ABOUT and click the flag.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC42G7DYOiuo381Rq_3dyIQQ
Observe the date of joining, which was yesterday. Why am I highlighting this? The name AND the photo are my mother's. She died on 13 April 2020. This is the way that the idiots work, and they have no morality or shame in pursuit of their attacks.
This person I suspect for a variety of reasons is more than likely from Australia, due to the times posting and the language used; plus various previous threats from 2 years ago, made to "get me back" for perceived infractions against them, in the same vane of a psychologically disturbed idiot, spending too much time worrying about me rather than improving their own lives.
While you're at reporting this channel, please also report these ones (also my mother's name and photos) : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCN3FT5LVoWtskT3t0Tte6gA https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6x6_meYOuAxa7eUN5Tz20w https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCah7uQgdilmvFp3ywP2r-Rg
All of these were reported before by myself many times, but we all know Youtube's idea of "truth" and upholding their own guidelines is as variable as the wind.
https://www.infowars.com/posts/this-information-could-destroy-the-covid-hoax-forever/
The full text of what Jones goes into detail over can be found below:
Here are 12 important questions and answers before considering getting vaccinated:
●”If I get vaccinated can I stop wearing a mask(s)?”
Government: “NO”
●”If I get vaccinated will the restaurants, bars, schools, fitness clubs, hair salons, etc. reopen and will people be able to get back to work like normal?
Government: “NO”
●”If I get vaccinated will I be resistant to Covid?”
Government: “Maybe. We don’t know exactly, but probably not.”
●”If I get vaccinated, at least I won’t be contagious to others – right?”
Government: “NO. the vaccine doesn’t stop transmission.”
●”If I get vaccinated, how long will the vaccine last?”
Government: “No one knows. All Covid “vaccines” are still in the experimental stage.”
● “If I get vaccinated, can I stop social distancing?”
Government: “NO”
● “If my parents, grandparents and myself all get vaccinated can we hug each other again?”
Government: “NO”
● “So what’s the benefit of getting vaccinated?”
Government: “Hoping that the virus won’t kill you.”
●”Are you sure the vaccine won’t injure or kill me?”
Government: “NO”
●”If statistically the virus won’t kill me (99.7% survival rate), why should I get vaccinated?”
Government: “To protect others.”
●”So if I get vaccinated, I can protect 100% of people I come in contact with?”
Government: “NO”
● “If I experience a severe adverse reaction, long-term effects (still unknown) or die from the vaccine will I (or my family) be compensated from the vaccine manufacture or the Government?”
Government: “NO – the government and vaccine manufacturer’s have 100% zero liability regarding this experimental drug”
So to summarize, the Covid19 “vaccine”…
Does not provide immunity
Does not eliminate the virus
Does not prevent death
Does not guarantee you won’t get it
Does not stop you from passing it on to others
Does not eliminate the need for travel bans
Does not eliminate the need for business closures
Does not eliminate the need for lockdowns!!!
A man with severe learning difficulties should have a Covid-19 vaccine, despite his family's objections, a judge ruled.
Specialists said the man, who is in his 30s, was "clinically vulnerable" and in a "priority group" for vaccination.
But the man's parents objected and raised a number of concerns about alleged side-effects.
Judge Jonathan Butler agreed with NHS Tameside & Glossop Clinical Commissioning Group that vaccination was in his best interests.
The judge, who is based in Manchester, considered the case at a hearing in the Court of Protection, where issues relating to people who lack the mental capacity to make decisions are analyzed.
He did not name the man in his written ruling, published on Friday.
A number of specialists involved in the man's care all thought he should be vaccinated but his father claimed the vaccine had not been tested sufficiently and did not stop people contracting Covid-19.
He added the long-term side effects on people with severe health issues were unknown.
The man's mother and brother agreed.
Judge Butler said the man's father had outlined his concerns with "conviction and great clarity".
'No clinical base' He added: "I have no doubt whatsoever that his objections are founded on a love for (his son) and a wish to ensure that he comes to no harm.
"His objections were not intrinsically illogical. They were certainly not deliberately obstructive.
"They were made upon the basis as to what he regards as being in the best interests of (his son).
"That concern for his son does him credit."
But he said the family's objections had "no clinical evidence base".
He said the man was vulnerable and said there was "overwhelming objective evidence of the magnetic advantage of a vaccination".
The judge said he had ruled that vaccination was in the man's best interests, but had not authorized "physical intervention".
Health authority bosses had said the vaccine would not be administered if any "form of physical intervention" was required.
A Tameside and Glossop Clinical Commissioning Group spokesperson said: "Our primary concern will always be the best clinical interests of our patients and we work closely with patients, families, and clinicians, and care providers to understand any concerns or judgments made about their care."
